I may not have been clear that these two separate tests both used the Delphi bridge (as you refer to it). What they point to is an unusual interaction between our full application and SQLite is triggering the increase in malloc calls.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: > > On 21 Jan 2012, at 11:20pm, Alek Paunov wrote: > > > 3.6.17: 14 seconds > > 3.7.9: 10 seconds > > > > This clearly demonstrates that the newer version of Sqlite is, all things > > being equal, superior in performance to the older. However, tests inside > > our Delphi application demonstrate that reaching the exact same point of > > the database result in the following times: > > > > Live Application > > > > 3.6.17: 16 seconds > > 3.7.9: 58 seconds > > Which implies that the fault is in the Delphi bridge to SQLite and any > pure examination of SQLite's behaviour isn't going to spot anything, right > ? So a better place to query this would be a Delphi list ? > > Simon. > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- John Elrick Fenestra Technologies 540-868-1377 _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
