Cache is the primary (and obvious) thing I can think of.
Michael D. Black Senior Scientist Advanced Analytics Directorate Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit Northrop Grumman Information Systems ________________________________ From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on behalf of Roger Binns [rog...@rogerbinns.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:57 PM To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: EXT :Re: [sqlite] 64-bit Windows Command Shell -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 21/03/12 05:28, Udi Karni wrote: > Is there - or can we kindly request that a 64-bit version of the > Command Shell be offered on the download page? > > A version that could run on Windows 7 64-bit and effectively use large > RAM? Which bit of the shell operation do you believe is limited by RAM and how did you work that out? Roger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk9qFpoACgkQmOOfHg372QRL7gCgmWpOxSgcuh1kvjwepNRJSGuy +JoAoIWoBPGk4aMzxor8fbNCLNsMEQm5 =QSVU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
