On 25 Nov 2012, at 9:12pm, Keith Chew <keith.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, thanks for the all the suggestions, I will find a workaround. The > reason I am asking is that I am using sqlite to perform data > synchronisation between a server and client, and after a day, the WAL file > size can grow to 3GB, quite a bit. I will look at improving the SQL update > to reduce some of the overhead.
Okay, if you're doing this set up updates to do synchronisation then you're going about it a very poor way. We've written a lot on this list about the problems with synchronisation over the years and you'll find that your way isn't going to be efficient. Instead of keeping a list of the modified data, consider keeping a list of the commands used to modify it. Or logging the fields modified as they're modified. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
