Dan, I haven't heard anything more about this. I was wondering if you also think the CPU performance for sqlite4 should be better? Maybe you could help me with where I could focus my attention in looking into this. I know that's probably a big question to a potentially complex issue, but might as well ask.
Thanks, Rob On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Rob Turpin <flax3...@gmail.com> wrote: > I understand it's still under development, but was curious about the > difference. I have commented out all of the debug defines and enabled > -DNDEBUG=1 for the sqlite4 build. > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>wrote: > >> >> On 18 Mar 2013, at 5:28pm, Rob Turpin <flax3...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > With sqlite3 there's a large difference between the CPU time and wall >> clock >> > time. No big deal, that's the I/O to disk. But then I'm wondering why >> the >> > difference with sqlite4 is so small? >> >> You know that SQLite4 is Not Ready for Primetime, right ? Might the >> distribution you're using have a bunch of debugging stuff in ? >> >> Simon. >> _______________________________________________ >> sqlite-users mailing list >> sqlite-users@sqlite.org >> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users >> > > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
