On 03/26/2013 06:34 AM, Rob Turpin wrote:
Dan,
I haven't heard anything more about this. I was wondering if you also
think the CPU performance for sqlite4 should be better? Maybe you could
help me with where I could focus my attention in looking into this. I know
that's probably a big question to a potentially complex issue, but might as
well ask.
I'm interested to know too. I think I'll try to recreate the test
when I get the chance. How large an initial database are you using?
Dan.
Thanks,
Rob
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Rob Turpin <[email protected]> wrote:
I understand it's still under development, but was curious about the
difference. I have commented out all of the debug defines and enabled
-DNDEBUG=1 for the sqlite4 build.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Simon Slavin <[email protected]>wrote:
On 18 Mar 2013, at 5:28pm, Rob Turpin <[email protected]> wrote:
With sqlite3 there's a large difference between the CPU time and wall
clock
time. No big deal, that's the I/O to disk. But then I'm wondering why
the
difference with sqlite4 is so small?
You know that SQLite4 is Not Ready for Primetime, right ? Might the
distribution you're using have a bunch of debugging stuff in ?
Simon.
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
