On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:52 PM, <ven...@intouchmi.com> wrote: > Simon and everyone who has thrown ideas into the mix, > I very much appreciate the effort that you folks have put into this! > If nothing else, I am learning from this exorcise. >
At this point, sounds like the only way to possibly make forward progress on this would be to post your DB somewhere, for hands-on testing by anyone. The fact you haven't done so suggests you cannot do that, but perhaps if you could somehow "anonymize" the data, like dropping all selected columns that do not participate in the where and join clauses, and dropping irrelevant tables, then maybe you could share something where the query continues to be slower than MS Access, that someone could explain or improve on somehow. Just my $0.02. --DD PS: I would also allow to load that same data into another RDBMS and see how it performs there too. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
