On Apr 2, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
> > On 2 Apr 2014, at 4:55pm, Kevin Xu <accol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> PRAGMA journal_mode=MEMORY; > > Since you're not using WAL mode, try it using WAL mode. If you were already > using WAL mode, I'd suggest trying with it off ! > > Given your answers to the questions so far, I can't think of anything else to > try you haven't already thought of. The result you report don't seem unusual > in any way. I'm not looking at them and thinking you've done anything wrong. > > Simon. > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users Yes, I have tried various combinations of WAL/OFF/MEMORY and they do not appear to affect the insert speed in any meaningful manner (e.g. +/- 0.3s on 500K inputs). However, http://blog.quibb.org/2010/08/fast-bulk-inserts-into-sqlite/ appear to to achieve an average of over 150K inserts per second over 4 million rows. I am aware that benchmark results are highly dependent on input size, platform, and hardware, I would imagine the SSD I am running on would not be such a tight bottleneck. Thus, I am trying to see if there is anything I can do to improve on this. Kevin _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
