On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:56 PM, jose isaias cabrera < > cabr...@wrc.xerox.com > > wrote: > > > > > Just noticed something... It may be nothing, but the MinGW built DLL has > > a size of 645KB while the MSVC built one has a size of 962KB. Just under > > 33% bigger. I hope there is nothing missing on the MinGW one. :-) It's > so > > weird how MS DLLs and programs are always so much bigger in size then > > non-MS built ones. Just food for thoughts... > > > > The MSVC DLL is 64-bit and the MinGW DLL is 32-bit. That accounts for part > of the difference. Additionally, MinGW was run with the -Os option > (optimize for small size) whereas MSVC was run with -O2 (optimize for > maximum speed). So MSVC is probably doing lots of function in-lining and > loop-unrolling that might make the code a little faster, but also makes it > bigger. > I compiled with mingw64 - a 64-bit DLL with -O2 is 650K -- ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
