Le 05/11/2014 23:08, Simon Slavin a écrit : > > On 5 Nov 2014, at 9:28pm, Edward Lau <elau1...@aim.com> wrote: > >> Maybe some time in the future a version 4 be started that incorporates many >> new advancement in the industry. Version 3 can still be continued for >> backwards compatibility and version 4 will break some but set the stage for >> the future. > > Like this, you mean ? > > <https://sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki> > > You might be particularly interested in the fact that there will be two > different types of storage engine, both pluggable: > > <https://sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/storage.wiki> > > I don't understand the details on that page, but one of those two looks like > it may allow more flexibility for external data supply than the current > virtual table implementation. But I may have misunderstood that. >
Thanks for these inputs. Concurrent execution of SQLite opcodes would be great. But it is far from our current needs :) About pluggable storage, that's interesting, but if I understand correctly, there could only be one pluggable storage per database, right ? What if you want many foreign tables with different (virtual) storages ? _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
