SQLite allow to attach more database at session level. Perhaps here you could find a solution Il 06/nov/2014 09:31 "Hugo Mercier" <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> Le 05/11/2014 23:08, Simon Slavin a écrit : > > > > On 5 Nov 2014, at 9:28pm, Edward Lau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Maybe some time in the future a version 4 be started that incorporates > many new advancement in the industry. Version 3 can still be continued for > backwards compatibility and version 4 will break some but set the stage for > the future. > > > > Like this, you mean ? > > > > <https://sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki> > > > > You might be particularly interested in the fact that there will be two > different types of storage engine, both pluggable: > > > > <https://sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/storage.wiki> > > > > I don't understand the details on that page, but one of those two looks > like it may allow more flexibility for external data supply than the > current virtual table implementation. But I may have misunderstood that. > > > > Thanks for these inputs. > > Concurrent execution of SQLite opcodes would be great. But it is far > from our current needs :) > > About pluggable storage, that's interesting, but if I understand > correctly, there could only be one pluggable storage per database, right > ? What if you want many foreign tables with different (virtual) storages ? > > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
