On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Dominique Devienne <ddevie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Dan Kennedy <danielk1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for tracking this down.Should be fixed here: > > > > http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/f095cde579e7417306 > > > Dan, the test reads: > > ifcapable fts3 { ... } > > yet both the comments and code use fts4. Should that be fts4, or it somehow > doesn't matter? --DD > fts3 and fts4 are really the same code base. fts4 merely enables some extra options that are not backwards compatible, so it had to have a different name. The ifcapable command in the test harness only understands "fts3". So I believe Dan's test case is correct as written. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
