On 23 Nov 2015, at 7:56am, Simon Slavin <slavins at bigfraud.org> wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2015, at 7:41am, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why keep bringing up SQLite4? AFAIK, SQLite4 has been inactive for a long >> time, and not much of a response anytime someone asks about it. > > It's a way of telling people who ask for features that it's not entirely > impossible they'll see them in the future. Just not until a major rewrite. Forgot to mention that one of those people is me. I have a number of major problems with tiny little details of SQLite. Most of them work the way they do because of backward compatibility. So I'm promising myself a simpler brighter life. At some unspecified (may never come) time in the future. Simon.
