On 28 Oct 2015, at 5:08pm, James K. Lowden <jklowden at schemamania.org> wrote:
> If we accept what you say, above, then why should > >> (9.2+7.8+0+3.0+1.3+1.7) > > in particular present any problem? There's no division. Each value > has an exact decimal representation. You didn't work it out yourself, did you ? 0.2 in binary is 0.0011001100110011... 0.3 in binary is 0.0100110011001100... They both recur at the 1/16th level. 0.7 and 0.8 are, of course, their complements. Only two tenths don't have problems in binary: point zero and point five. Simon.
