On 29 Feb 2016, at 1:28pm, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can an authorizer really be "abused" that way? You're quite right. It's not useful for this. Thanks for the heads-up. Sorry. Simon.
On 29 Feb 2016, at 1:28pm, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne at gmail.com> wrote:
> Can an authorizer really be "abused" that way? You're quite right. It's not useful for this. Thanks for the heads-up. Sorry. Simon.