On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Simon Slavin <[email protected]> wrote:
> I prefer your idea of opening the file and randomly overwriting a few > bytes. Of course some of them will just be values in unindexed fields, so > there would be no damage SQLite could notice. I wish for the day SQLite has page checksums to detect any such random corruption. Yes, I know, it's a format change, and will likely slow things down a little, but it's worth it IMHO. SQLite4, as you used to say Simon... --DD _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
