9/30054 means 99.97% tests are working. That's a great achievement anyway. Performance problems can be profiled and optimized simpler than with native version.
That isn't a nature of managed code to be slow. i.e. Perst DB which is managed from scratch is same speed or faster than SQLite (especially on embedded platforms). That's not because of C#, but because of different architecture, but still it shows that there are plenty of room. So don't froze this project please - there is a high demand on it exist. Max Noah Hart wrote: > > Max, I missed posting the remaining errors > > Current results ... > 9 errors out of 30054 tests > > Still skipping about 9 additional tests > > Noah > > Kosenko Max wrote: >> >> Wow, that's impressive. >> >> And very interesting that you've gained 3x-5x performance gain. >> Don't make this project educational only. I'm sure you'll find additional >> contributors. Just recently Miguel de Icaza was asking for line by line >> port of SQLite to C#. >> >> Great achievement that all tests are passing now. >> >> Max. >> >> >> Noah Hart wrote: >>> >>> I am pleased to announce that the C# port is done to the point where >>> others can look at it. >>> >>> The project is located at http://code.google.com/p/sqlitecs >>> >>> Enjoy, >>> >>> Noah Hart >>> >> > > ----- Best Regards. Max Kosenko. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANN%3A--SQLite-3.6.16.C--tp24764742p24776975.html Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
