While implementing a table that intended for arbitrary table storage, I automatically named some field rowid not linking at the moment that it will have a name conflict with sqlite internal rowid name. Lately I discovered this, and (not a big deal) recreated table with a different name. But just wondering, was allowing to create such field intentional? As I suppose such field is complete phantom since most sql queries will interpret rowid internally and won't allow access this user field at all.
Max _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
