On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Sidney Cadot <sid...@jigsaw.nl> wrote:
> What I was wondering is whether the SQLite docs (written by you, I > presume) express a preference for using SQLite3 via inclusion of the > source (amalgamation) into ones project, vs. using a pre-compiled > library (as could be provided, for example, by a linux distribution). Separate files vs. amalgamation, and statically vs. dynamic linking of sqlite are two completely orthogonal issues. The manual section you quote refers only to the first of the two issue. With regard to the second issue, several experienced people, including Richard Hipp, have expressed the opinion in more than one occasion that statically linking sqlite avoids some problems that can happen otherwise. Evaluating the pro and the contra of the two choices for each particular project is a task that only the people involved in the project can perform. Hope this helps. P. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
