On 12/28/06, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So the solution for now, I think, would be to stop testing for the > error 2006 and raise an error.
Yes, this would be the solution with the smallest effort. It would result in the same code as in SQLObject 0.7. As already mentioned in the initial e-mail, the type 20013 must also be changed back to 2013. Kind regards, Markus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ sqlobject-discuss mailing list sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
