On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:01:06PM +0100, Markus Gritsch wrote:
> On 12/28/06, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So the solution for now, I think, would be to stop testing for the
> >error 2006 and raise an error.
>
> Yes, this would be the solution with the smallest effort. It would
> result in the same code as in SQLObject 0.7.
>
> As already mentioned in the initial e-mail, the type 20013 must also
> be changed back to 2013.
Fixed in the trunk and 0.8 branch (revisions 2158-2160). Will be in
0.8.0b2. Thank you!
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
