On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 04:22:16PM +0100, Dr. Markus Gritsch wrote:
> Sounds quite ok.
And, BTW, there is an unexplored SolidConnection from DBUtil. I just
remembered I have to look into it.
> Still, have you any opinion about the pooling-stuff?
It has to be preserved, I think.
> Further, Dan had also some concerns about transactions. He wrote that
> if the reconnectiong would happen at MySQLdb level, it could be
> handled gracefully, but that things will get messed up which the patch
> to SQLObject, if transactions are involved.
Yes, I remember. This means we have to point everyone to the MySQLdb
patch instead of implementing anything in SQLObject.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
