[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13136256#comment-13136256
]
Aaron Kimball commented on SQOOP-365:
-------------------------------------
@Arvind, These responses all make sense. Thank you for clarifying this.
@Rob I'd point out that "there is no risk of version conflicts" is perhaps
optimistic. The client still has to speak a subset of the REST API that the
server supports. As I read the spec, it's still an open question as to how the
REST API will be versioned (if at all?) and what the plan is for the REST
server to support older versions of its protocol.
> Proposal for next major revision of Sqoop.
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-365
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Arvind Prabhakar
> Assignee: Arvind Prabhakar
> Attachments: sqoop2.tar.gz
>
>
> This issue tracks the design and development of the next major revision of
> Sqoop. The proposal has been articulated on the wiki at the following
> location:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop+2
> Please review the proposal and add your comments to this JIRA.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
