slimkid;199326 Wrote: 
> I'm not sure I fully understand all this. Pandora is an American
> service, paying royalties to American labels and mostly American
> artists (or ones who record for American labels) under American
> legislature. Now, what I don't understand is why would American
> legislative body try to prevent them from selling their services
> internatianlly, as long as they fulfill their domestic duties.

The relatively short answer, at least as far as I understand it, is
that when the U.S. Congress created the copyright law, they realized it
was essentially granting a monopoly so they allowed some other uses:
fair use, statutory licenses, etc.  Broadcast audio is typically
statutory licensed -- that is, the copyright holder is forced to allow
broadcasting but is paid a royalty for the use.

This license is compelled by U.S. law, but the holders rights are
recognized internationally (via Copyright treaty), unfortunately
without an equivalent statutory license.  So...  Pandora simply can't
broadcast outside the U.S. because the rights holder hasn't granted
them that right.  If they did, they would be violating both U.S. law,
and the international treaty recognizing copyrights.

They have to license music broadcast rights country-by-country for use
outside the U.S.


-- 
JimC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JimC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9428
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34967

_______________________________________________
squeezenetwork mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/squeezenetwork

Reply via email to