Evan05;258430 Wrote: > At best they might help thier potential customers access the service > that the system is designed for.
Yes, because offering to the public a method or service that circumvents a technological measure that effectively controls access to a protected work is a wise thing to do in the US. (hint: doing such would violate the DMCA.) Yeah, yeah, you are upset that Pandora is restricting its area: but geebus put the blame where it belongs: it is not Slim, it is not Pandora, it is the licensing agencies that want too much money. (Or, perhaps, it is you if you are not paying.... but that is another matter...) Demanding that Slim break the law in the US (where most of the SMS division is locates) is silly and pointless. Demanding thst Pandora just say to hell with the costs and give you free music so that they can be sued into the ground is silly and pointless. Now, telling your elected officials what you think of compulsory license fees for net radio... or telling your licensing agencies what you think... that may have more effect. -- snarlydwarf ------------------------------------------------------------------------ snarlydwarf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1179 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41626 _______________________________________________ squeezenetwork mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/squeezenetwork
