On Thu, Aug 14, 2003, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > OK for me. COSS is an experimental feature and not under code freeze > even for Squid-2.5. Just remember to update the patches page after > commit.
I'll do that once I've finished my rebuild code. > If you need to touch any files outside of src/fs/coss/ then stricter > rules apply. I won't be. Pwomise. > But my back of the head says why is this development not done in > Squid-3? We need to start moving development to Squid-3 soon or > Squid-3.0 will never receive any good amount of testing. Because I want to deploy this as an easily reversable change on a university cache or two. > If there is customers involved who require Squid-2.5 then sure, 2.5 it > is. If not I see no reason why making anything in 2.5 beyond fixing > bugs to non-experimental features. Well, theoretically, I should be able to easily forwardport my COSS changes to 3.0 once I know it works. Believe me, once its running I'm going to be looking to move to 3.0. kqueue and epoll are my next thing to sell. :) adrian
