Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 21:35 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On fre, 2007-12-14 at 18:26 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
He suggested a big(ger) delay than a few days to wait for bugs to
prevent 'inventing two patches for two branches'.
My opinion:
With SQUID_3_0 branched there is no reason to hold back stuff from
Squid-3 HEAD.
Usually bugfixes is quite easy to back/forwardport, even if a lot has
changed.
Many of the more difficult bugs is found by testing new things.
+1.
My only regret is that I did not do the astyle check yet. If you can
check what the latest astyle does to Squid3, please do that. I think
having common automated format before the big commits would minimize
formatting conflicts.
Do you have a set of test-files to check this easily instead of a whole
codebase manual check each time?
Amos
