Robert Collins wrote: >> What about the sourceforge developers repository? > > Because bzr is natively distributed we don't need to have a dedicated > developers repository like we have with CVS - anyone using bzr will get > their own copy of the repository automatically; they can commit there as > often as they like, rollback, merge etc. >
I do not know how practical are in real life all these thinks but looks at least good idea. Normally when I am working I am having a number of copies of a branch in my computer and I am trying different thinks on these copies. Then I am extracting patches from these copies and merging the changes in the main branch-copy from where I am commiting the changes. Looks that with the new VCS's all this work become easier...