On Tue, Jan 08, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: > I looked at this for 3.1, but the config parser there confused me with > its multiple meanings of 'file'. > I'd definately like to see how you are doing it in 2 for a side-port.
Well, its in the tree. :) > FWIW; I believe we should with 3.1 and 2.7 be shipping the cfgman pages > as the docs instead of squid.conf.default. > Thats just a re-ordering of the release script to build them into > docs/cfgman before bundling. Yeah. I think its a bit late in the game to be doing that for squid-2.7 (unless someone can do it right now!) but I really want to see a cleaner default configuration file breakdown in Squid-2.8, including a default "local" acl example. Adrian
