Responses inline, and a couple more:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
On 20/04/2009, at 4:46 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Mark Nottingham wrote:
Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to apply the patches attached to
the following bugs:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631
response in bugzilla.
Likewise.
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
IMO, this should be number of times squid tries _each_ available
forwarding method before giving up on it. With a default of
something lower, 1 or 2 may be reasonable in most of todays internet.
+1 on the configurable idea though.
Sorry, could you explain what you mean by each method? Is it direct
vs. peer?
Definitely relevant to squid-3, if you commit this for 2 before it
gets to 3, please just comment "commited to squid-2" and bump target
milestone to 3.HEAD
Ack.
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2515
Looks good to me. Mind the formatting though.
Yeah. Still can't get the proper version of indent running on OSX, so
I have to shove it to another box to indent before submission...
Is it relevant to squid-3 parser?
Don't think so; StringToInt64 doesn't look at errno.
--
Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com
