Responses inline, and a couple more:

http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2642
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643


On 20/04/2009, at 4:46 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:

Mark Nottingham wrote:
Unless I hear otherwise, I'm going to apply the patches attached to the following bugs:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631

response in bugzilla.

Likewise.


http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632

IMO, this should be number of times squid tries _each_ available forwarding method before giving up on it. With a default of something lower, 1 or 2 may be reasonable in most of todays internet.

+1 on the configurable idea though.

Sorry, could you explain what you mean by each method? Is it direct vs. peer?


Definitely relevant to squid-3, if you commit this for 2 before it gets to 3, please just comment "commited to squid-2" and bump target milestone to 3.HEAD

Ack.


http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2515

Looks good to me. Mind the formatting though.

Yeah. Still can't get the proper version of indent running on OSX, so I have to shove it to another box to indent before submission...

Is it relevant to squid-3 parser?

Don't think so; StringToInt64 doesn't look at errno.


--
Mark Nottingham       m...@yahoo-inc.com


Reply via email to