On 23/04/2009, at 2:11 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:


On 21/04/2009, at 10:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
<snip>

http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643

Amos, any thoughts about the revised patch ("monitor-direct")?


I still don't agree that this is anything close to the Right Way to do it. Easy, yes, but thats all. Please hold off until Henrik can get a good look
at it and voice his opinion.

OK. Henrik?

FWIW, I think this is the right way to do it -- a flag saying that monitoring should be direct is backwards-compatible, easy for users to understand, and addresses the use case.


http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631

Amos, does this make sense now?


http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632

I think we cleared up confusion in discussion; applying unless I hear
otherwise.


Well, Henrik may have other opinions since he has to manage it. But I'm no
longer objecting to it as a temporary measure.

Assuming that this applies to both. H?


--
Mark Nottingham       m...@yahoo-inc.com


Reply via email to