On 23/04/2009, at 2:11 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
On 21/04/2009, at 10:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
<snip>
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
Amos, any thoughts about the revised patch ("monitor-direct")?
I still don't agree that this is anything close to the Right Way to
do it.
Easy, yes, but thats all. Please hold off until Henrik can get a
good look
at it and voice his opinion.
OK. Henrik?
FWIW, I think this is the right way to do it -- a flag saying that
monitoring should be direct is backwards-compatible, easy for users to
understand, and addresses the use case.
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631
Amos, does this make sense now?
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
I think we cleared up confusion in discussion; applying unless I hear
otherwise.
Well, Henrik may have other opinions since he has to manage it. But
I'm no
longer objecting to it as a temporary measure.
Assuming that this applies to both. H?
--
Mark Nottingham m...@yahoo-inc.com
