The whole struct is on the local stack. Hence bzero() or memset() to 0.
2009/10/2 Matt W. Benjamin <m...@linuxbox.com>: > Bzero? Is it an already-allocated array/byte sequence? (Apologies, I > haven't seen the code.) Assignment to NULL/0 is in fact correct for > initializing a sole pointer, and using bzero for that certainly isn't > typical. Also, for initializing a byte range, memset is preferred [see Linux > BZERO(3), which refers to POSIX.1-2008 on that point]. > > STYLE(9) says use NULL rather than 0, and it is clearer. But C/C++ > programmers should know that NULL is 0. And note that at least through 1998, > initialization to 0 was the preferred style in C++, IIRC. > > Matt > > ----- "Adrian Chadd" <adr...@squid-cache.org> wrote: > >> I've just replied to the ticket in question. It should probably just >> be a bzero() rather than setting the pointer to 0. Which should >> really >> be setting it to NULL. >> >> Anyway, please test whether the bzero() works. If it does then I'll >> commit that fix to HEAD and 2.7. >> >> 2009/9/28 Jason Noble <ja...@linuxbox.com>: >> > I have opened a bug for this issue here: >> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2788 Also, the previous >> patch was not generated against head so I re-rolled the patch against >> current head and attached to the bug report > > -- > > Matt Benjamin > > The Linux Box > 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 > Ann Arbor, MI 48104 > > http://linuxbox.com > > tel. 734-761-4689 > fax. 734-769-8938 > cel. 734-216-5309 > >