On 10.09.2012 01:12, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 9/9/2012 2:54 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
++ It is questionable whether the store-URL should also be below
the
no_cache_done bits as well. Since requests with"cache deny" are not
going to be loaded from cache, but maybe they will be stored later
by
future Squid (which will need store-URL changes then) - in current
squid
they are useless passing to the storeurl helper.
When we will be there then...
Are there any visible plans?
Not as yet. It just shows up as a HTTP/1.1 non-compliance TODO entry
about making "Cache-Control:no-cache" from the client prevent cache read
but allow cache write instead of having it discard the response.
Amos
