On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On 10/06/2013 8:35 a.m., Francesco Chemolli wrote:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> revno: 12903
>> committer: Francesco Chemolli <kin...@squid-cache.org>
>> branch nick: trunk
>> timestamp: Sun 2013-06-09 22:35:58 +0200
>> message:
>>    Instruct clang not to treat unused command line arguments as errors
>> modified:
>>    acinclude/compiler-flags.m4
>
>
> Anyone known why we have the "-Wno-error=parentheses-equality" option in teh
> first place?
>  It would seem to me to be one of the warnings highlighting a coding
> guideline violation we need to fix in the sources. Not something to be
> suppressed.

I do, as I added it:

in case of
if (bool foo = somefunction()) {
}

gcc -Werror barfs unless it's expressed as:
if ((bool foo = somefunction())) {
}

while clang -Werror barfs for the unneeded parentheses, at least for
some clang versions
That option makes clang accept the GCC-ism.
The portable solution would probably be a macro:
stuff like:
if (MAYBE_PARENTHESIZE(bool foo = somefunction()) {
}

That'd be a readability FAIL.

--
    /kinkie

Reply via email to