On 14 Feb 2014, at 13:24, Amos Jeffries <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just to kick this further along. I've put together the proposal in patch
> form.
>
> Anyone game to test the SMP support is working properly with "-M
> foreground" when this is applied?
>
> I'm also beginning to think we are needing to add getopts_long() support
> and just use "--foreground" for the no-daemon mode.
> If the attached patch actually works regardign SMP and we agree on the
> user-visible bit I'm happy to add that update for the command line and
> commit.
I'd also add an option to keep the current -N behaviour, such as uniproc,
single-proc, one-process or something similar.
What do you think?
Kinkie
