On 15/02/2014 6:47 a.m., Francesco Chemolli wrote: > > On 14 Feb 2014, at 13:24, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > >> Just to kick this further along. I've put together the proposal in patch >> form. >> >> Anyone game to test the SMP support is working properly with "-M >> foreground" when this is applied? >> >> I'm also beginning to think we are needing to add getopts_long() support >> and just use "--foreground" for the no-daemon mode. >> If the attached patch actually works regardign SMP and we agree on the >> user-visible bit I'm happy to add that update for the command line and >> commit. > > I'd also add an option to keep the current -N behaviour, such as uniproc, > single-proc, one-process or something similar. > What do you think?
With the proposed patch -N is still working as before. But with an added deprecation notice to encourage all those who just want foreground semantics without the debug limits to use the new way. Amos
