I agree with the power fo rpm, but still i think that compiling from the actual code gives you more options to control and configure.
--- Elsen Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It should do fine, depending how to squid.conf is > > written. But....ding! dong!, rpm is for as you > said > > newbies, one should always configure from src, to > have > > more flexiblity and better performance. > > Ding dong !,Boink ! Kadoeeiing... One of your bells > just fell out of the it's tower. > The power and flexibility of rpm as a tool > for managing sw. packages on in consistent manner, > doesn't > always make it oriented towards newbies. > Often for SQUID however there's need to : > > - use options to squid which may not have > been built (added) > when a specific rpm was made > - use the latest version of SQUID when no rpm > is available. > > > M. > ===== Regards, Mohsin Khan CCNA ( Cisco Certified Network Associate 2.0 ) http://pk.aaghaz.net >>>Happy is the one who can smile<<< __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
