>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Elsen" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: >> <squid-users@squid-cache.org> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 11:59 >> AM Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid cache delay? >> >> >>> Hello, I've got a recurring problem with squid. I'm running it on >>> a freebsd6 box installed from the latest port. Approximately >>> every 3 to 4 days internet access slows to a crawl, and on the >>> squid box squid processes are up in cpu time. Additionally >>> whenever a lan machine requests a page the squid box's hard disk >>> spins up and goes crazy for about 30 seconds, then when it's done >>> the page is finally served. I'm assuming it has something to do >>> with the squid cache setup i'm running, which is only a single >>> directory, a squid -k reconfigure relieves the problem. My >>> squid.conf file has this: >>> cache_dir ufs /usr/local/squid/cache 100 16 256 >>> I am thinking about increasing these values, would a >>> different cache storage type help? If i add another cache >>> directory would this problem reoccur? >>> Thanks. >>> Dave. >>> >>> >> >> >> - http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.html#ss11.46 >> >> - Does SQUID have sufficient memory on your system ; verify that >> the squid process is not swapping. >> >> M. >> >> > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 9:36 AM > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid cache delay? > > > Hello, Thanks for the suggestion. I checked out the faq and /dev/null > does not appear to be the issue. Memory, this box has 1gb of ram, and > during these high cpu periods i do not detect swapping. I'm > suspecting that since the cache is full squid is dumping the oldest > items and taking a while to do it. I'm wondering if adding another > cache directory, changing the size of this one, or using a different > cache format will aliviate this? > Thanks. > Dave. >
Try using aufs or diskd instead of ufs... Adding another cache_dir directive will not help (unless it's on another spindle/drive). For what it's worth, the "single directory" is a single parent directory. The additional arguments to cache_dir specify how many sub directories to use (in your case, 16 sub-directories with 256 sub-sub-directories each, or 4096 directories in total, not including the parent). For 100MB of content, that's plenty. Chris
