On tis, 2007-08-21 at 14:55 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > It'll choose the cache dir with the least pending disk ops, if you haven't > configured any other restriction (min/max object size.)
No, not with aufs. They internally all share the same queue. With aufs it currently basically selects the cache_dir based on amount of free space, or at least that's the idea.. > > Normally, (when all using ufs/ffs) all the squidcache1/2/3 dirs start > > filling > > first and the cache0 dir fills slowest. However, with the 3 using zfs, > > cache0 > > is filling much faster. Is this indicitive of the 3 cache_dirs using zfs > > are somehow slower, so its using cache0 more? Odd.. the underlying filesystem should have little or no impact on how Squid selects cache diretory. Regards Henrik
