On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 17:19 -0800, Geoffrey Garen wrote: > > My current plan is to use lazy tear-off, but not with activations. > > Does this mean that a function that uses both let and var will allocate two > scope objects? By my math, that's 2X worse than the alternative. :)
It the scope is not captured, of course that would be zero scope objects :) But "let" and "const" declarations at the function toplevel should probably be stored in the activation, so there's no penalty in that case. Regards, Andy _______________________________________________ squirrelfish-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/squirrelfish-dev
