Hi Gavin, Thanks for the feedback; I see where you're coming from.
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 17:29 -0800, Gavin Barraclough wrote: > (2) Introduce a new scope object for use in place of the activation > for functions that don't capture arguments or use eval, switch such > functions over to use the new scope object, demonstrate a benefit, and > adopt this approach . Then as a separate step use the new scope > object to implement block scopes. I will try this option. Though, I would like to avoid predicating the implementation of block scope on more general optimizations -- I like making things fast, but in this case it's the feature that I care about :) > BTW, for the new scope object, I'd suggest the name 'JSClosure'. What about "JSStaticScope"? As in, refactor the existing JSStaticScope into being this sort of lazy tear-off scope. Regards, Andy _______________________________________________ squirrelfish-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/squirrelfish-dev
