>> No, why? Since I've moved sessions to an NFS shared point that >> should be fine. No? > > You WILL get goofy behaviour with this due to NFS's lack of flock() > support. SQM > will work, but strange things will happen (messages being deleted from the > wrong > folder, for example) when sessions start getting clobbered. At the very > least, > establish persistence to your web servers on your load balancer so the > one-web-server-at-a-time can serialize requests to the PHP session as the > user > makes simultaneous requests. > > If you go to storing the sessions in the database, I don't know if load > balancing > will work at all without modifications being made to SQM (i.e., adding > explicit > row locks at appropriate places).
php auto_prepend_file option. That's all I am using on test machine. SquirrelMail scripts are not modified. Main problem - plugins that load functions/strings.php before include/validate.php. I might enable dummy1 interface and put two test web servers on dns rr, but that would take more time. -- Tomas ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: [email protected] List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
