>> If using NFS as the session store, you don't even have to get this specific >> -- >> one >> user using "his" session from two servers simultaneously will eventually see >> problems. > > Isn't that an argument not to use LVS persistence?
Using persistence is a shield against this sort of problem. It allows changes to be sync'd NFS-wise and to ensure that "the previous web server" isn't doing anything else with the session file. All user activity within the persistence timeout is bound to "the previous web server" unless that server goes away. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: [email protected] List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
