> Is this fix this issue too?
> [#2404
> (comment)](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2404#issuecomment-661060298)
>
> when used
>
> ```
> bind_ipv6_link_local=0
> ```
I am not sure. The whole identification code is too convoluted for a casual
analysis. If you can apply and test, we'll get the answer back.
As I said, this whole part will benefit from a rewrite. It'll be smaller,
easier to analyze, more efficient and less error prone - for example, right now
it's performing almost the same exchange with netlink twice and it can't handle
dropped netlink messages.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/2595#issuecomment-754183712
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
