On Friday 29 July 2011, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > On 7/29/11 4:00 PM, Alex Hermann wrote: > Indeed there is kind of "conflict of interests" here. Maybe the ipops > can get a slightly different implementation, where the match can be, > based on parameters, restricted to a network address match. I thought > would be useful in non-nat-travesal cases, where nathelper is not loaded.
IMHO general ip to netmask matching should belong in ipops. For now i still believe the check for rfc1918 addresses is more suitable for nathelper. As long as the function is available, i don't care very much where it is, i just hope the code duplication will stop at one point. -- Greetings, Alex Hermann _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
