2011/7/29 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com>:
> Indeed there is kind of "conflict of interests" here. Maybe the ipops can
> get a slightly different implementation, where the match can be, based on
> parameters, restricted to a network address match. I thought would be useful
> in non-nat-travesal cases, where nathelper is not loaded.

I've already implemented it in ipops module. The function (not
commited yet) is called "ip_is_rfc1918()" not to conflict with
"is_rfc1918()" function in nathelper module (I'd really would like
*namespaces* for separating module functions!) :)

Is it ok if I commit it?

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<i...@aliax.net>

_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to