srfi-72  

Messages by Date

• 2025/08/14 Re: SRFI 72 sample implementation incorrect Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2025/08/07 Re: SRFI 72 sample implementation incorrect Zhu Zihao
• 2024/09/10 Re: SRFI 72 sample implementation incorrect Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2024/09/04 SRFI 72 sample implementation incorrect Daphne Preston-Kendal
• 2020/08/11 Re: Link to reference implementation is broken Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2020/08/11 Link to reference implementation is broken Jeronimo Pellegrini (via srfi-72 list)
• 2020/02/11 Re: Broken links Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2020/02/11 Re: Broken links Vladimir Nikishkin
• 2020/02/11 Re: Broken links Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2020/02/11 Re: Broken links Vladimir Nikishkin
• 2020/02/11 Re: Broken links Arthur A. Gleckler
• 2020/02/11 Broken links Vladimir Nikishkin
• 2006/12/11 Re: Expanding to uses of unquote, unquote-slicing AndrevanTonder
• 2006/06/27 Lazy/eager Andre van Tonder
• 2005/09/27 Final SRFI 72: Hygienic macros. srfi-editors
• 2005/09/16 Update to SRFI-72 draft Andre van Tonder
• 2005/09/08 Re: DrScheme version with source location tracking Andre van Tonder
• 2005/09/07 Re: DrScheme version with source location tracking Per Bothner
• 2005/09/07 DrScheme version with source location tracking Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/31 Re: Update to SRFI 72 (Sorry I'm lost) Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/31 Re: Update to SRFI 72 (Sorry I'm lost) Panu Kalliokoski
• 2005/08/30 Re: Update to SRFI 72 (Sorry I'm lost) Keith Wright
• 2005/08/29 Update to SRFI 72 Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/26 Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/25 Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Alan Watson
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Alan Watson
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Alan Watson
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Alan Watson
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction bear
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/24 Re: loss of abstraction Panu Kalliokoski
• 2005/08/23 Re: loss of abstraction bear
• 2005/08/23 Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/23 Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/23 Re: loss of abstraction Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/23 Re: loss of abstraction Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/23 Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/23 Re: loss of abstraction Panu Kalliokoski
• 2005/08/23 Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/23 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/22 Re: Opaque thought experiment Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/22 Re: Opaque thought experiment Matthias Neubauer
• 2005/08/22 Re: loss of abstraction bear
• 2005/08/22 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate bear
• 2005/08/22 Re: loss of abstraction Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/22 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/22 loss of abstraction Andrew Wilcox
• 2005/08/22 Opaque thought experiment Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/22 Re: The power of Lists Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/21 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Panu Kalliokoski
• 2005/08/21 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate bear
• 2005/08/21 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/21 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/20 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/20 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate bear
• 2005/08/20 Re: The power of Lists Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/20 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/20 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Matthias Neubauer
• 2005/08/20 Re: The power of Lists Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/20 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/19 Re: The power of Lists Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/18 Re: Namespaces Keith Wright
• 2005/08/18 Re: question on the opaque syntax object debate Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/18 question on the opaque syntax object debate Andrew Wilcox
• 2005/08/17 Re: Namespaces Martin Gasbichler
• 2005/08/16 Re: Namespaces Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/16 Re: Namespaces Matthias Neubauer
• 2005/08/16 Re: Namespaces Martin Gasbichler
• 2005/08/15 Re: The power of Lists Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/15 Re: The power of Lists Keith Wright
• 2005/08/15 Re: The power of Lists Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/15 Re: Namespaces Matthias Neubauer
• 2005/08/15 Re: Namespaces Matthias Neubauer
• 2005/08/15 Re: Namespaces Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/15 Connection between runtime and expand-time Panu Kalliokoski
• 2005/08/15 Re: Namespaces Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Keith Wright
• 2005/08/14 Re: Namespaces Keith Wright
• 2005/08/14 The power of Lists Keith Wright
• 2005/08/14 Re: Namespaces Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/14 Re: Namespaces Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/14 Re: Namespaces Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/14 Re: Namespaces Martin Gasbichler
• 2005/08/14 Re: Namespaces Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects bear
• 2005/08/14 Namespaces Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/14 Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/13 Re: Opaque syntax objects [course positions] Per Bothner
• 2005/08/13 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/13 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/13 Re: begin-for-syntax, begin-for-load should be in this SRFI Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/13 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/13 Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/13 begin-for-syntax, begin-for-load should be in this SRFI Keith Wright
• 2005/08/13 Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/13 Re: Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/13 Re: Opaque syntax objects Keith Wright
• 2005/08/12 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/12 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/12 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/12 Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/12 Re: Opaque syntax objects Jens Axel Søgaard
• 2005/08/12 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/12 Re: Opaque syntax objects Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/12 Re: Opaque syntax objects felix winkelmann
• 2005/08/12 Opaque syntax objects Michael Sperber
• 2005/08/09 Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/09 Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/09 Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/09 Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Panu A. Kalliokoski
• 2005/08/08 Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? felix winkelmann
• 2005/08/08 Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Keith Wright
• 2005/08/08 Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Keith Wright
• 2005/08/08 Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/08 Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Panu
• 2005/08/05 Re: hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/05 Update available Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/04 hygiene when using multiple instances of a macro..? Panu Kalliokoski
• 2005/08/04 Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Keith Wright
• 2005/08/04 Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Andre van Tonder
• 2005/08/04 Re: How many arguments to a macro transformer? Andre van Tonder