bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Check me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know the only real problem with > that was the performance hit.
No, the problem is the loss of abstraction. > I mean, if there were no performance problems, wouldn't it be more > powerful to be programming in a lisp where there were no separate > macroexpansion and compilation phases, and all the semantics were > available at runtime? You're joking, right? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
