Chris Garages wrote:
>
> So does this mean it's now official that the freeware version of ssh that
> we're all using is now considered dead by datafellows? I guess this explains
> why we've never seen the long promised 1.2.27.
>
> Chris
Hello Chris:
No it does not go that way, actually the 1.2.26 is the
latest Non - Comercial
version of SSH.
And many of our users are using that version without even
knowing that the
Protocol 2 is out there!
So I was just informing you that, and if you need more
performance and there is
a few bugs on the version that you are using what we do is
that we recommend
to upgrade.
In your particular case, It may be a bug I do not have
tested it myself yet,
however I may just test it tonight and see what happens, i
hope I can recreate the
same problem.
If I do and find a way around it I will let you know.
Thanks for replying back..
Jose.
> > From: Jose Muniz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:51:45 -0800
> >
> > Holger Trapp wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > the percentage value reported by scp 1.2.26 as part of the statistics
> > > display is incorrectly calculated when transferring large files (650 MB i
> > n my
> > > case) from a remote server to the local machine.
> > >
> > > If this is old news please ignore my message. Otherwise I suggest to fix
> > it in
> > > SSH 1.2.27 if this release should ever appear :-)
> > >
> > > The percentage is calculated in two functions:
> > >
> > > - in source(), when the local scp process is sending data,
> > >
> > > - and in sink(), when the local scp process is receiving data.
> > >
> > > In source() the calculation is correct:
> > >
> >
> > Hello Holger:
> >
> > Well, let me out it this way, is not that is old news but
> > rather a very old
> > version of SSH.
> > Well I do not remember seeing 1.2.27 however I have seen
> > 1.3.6 and 2.0.12.
> > Well, we really appreciate your comments, and really
> > recommend you to get
> > a newer version of SSH.
> > BTW:
> > Did you know that now we fully support SFTP at the command
> > prompt with
> > either client, I mean with the windows clients as well as
> > the UNIX Clients.
> >
> > Thanks for the input.
> > --
> > Best regards.
> >
> > Jose.
> >
> > _____________________________________________
> >
> > Jose Muniz. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Technical Support Engineer.
> > Data Fellows, Inc.
> > Phone 408.938.6700
> > Fax 408.938.1894
> >
> > 675 N. First Street, 8th Floor
> > San Jose, Ca. 95112
> > www.DataFellows.com
> > _____________________________________________
> > F-Secure:
> > Integrated Solutions for Enterprise Security
> > _____________________________________________
>
> --
> Chris Garrigues Deep Eddy Internet Consulting
> +1 512 432 4046 609 Deep Eddy Avenue O-
> http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ Austin, TX 78703-4513
>
> My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an
> explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html
>
> Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
> but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
--
Best regards.
Jose.
_____________________________________________
Jose Muniz. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Support Engineer.
Data Fellows, Inc.
Phone 408.938.6700
Fax 408.938.1894
675 N. First Street, 8th Floor
San Jose, Ca. 95112
www.DataFellows.com
_____________________________________________
F-Secure:
Integrated Solutions for Enterprise Security
_____________________________________________
