On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Blue Lang wrote: > > With ftp, the result is ~1000kb/s (10632.27). > > ftp does not have to turn your files into carefully-crafted line noise > prior to delivery, nor turn it back when delivered. scp has an enourmous > overhead. 185k/sec is not so bad. I see ((: Just wondering if the result I got was 'normal'. Also tried with compression but I only gained some seconds. Is the performance of SSH an issue in the dev quarters? if not it should be. rgds /PL
- scp performance. P Lanvin
- Re: scp performance. Blue Lang
- Re: scp performance. P Lanvin
- Re: scp performance. Blue Lang
- Re: scp performance. P Lanvin
- Re: scp performance. Blue Lang
- Re: scp performance. P Lanvin
- Re: scp performance. Blue Lang
- Re: scp performance. Todd M. Wilkinson
- Re: scp performance. Bob Babcock
- Re: scp performance. James Treworgy
- Re: scp performance. Daniel Woods
- Re: scp performance. Blue Lang
