There is another one as well: http://cygwin.com/ is a package of *nix tools
for Win32, including OpenSSH. I use it and it works VERY well. And
understanding of *nix is an asset, but not necessarily required.
For more information, see: http://mike.erdelynet.com/sshd.asp.
Mike Erdely
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mike.erdelynet.com/
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Patrik Carlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "SSH mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: SSHd for Win2K
> There are two for SSH2:
>
> http://www.ssh.com
> http://www.vandyke.com
>
> For SSH1, there is one:
> http://www.pragmasys.com
>
> -Anne
>
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:13:34AM +0100, Patrik Carlsson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > anybody worked with the WinNT/2K Server version of SSH? Im having a
> > irritating problem, only users with from the administrators group are
> > allowed to log on using SSH. (Cant find any obvious remote access
difference
> > in the admin group from users group). Others are, well simply put not
> > allowed. In debug mode of the server it produces some what I think is
error
> > codes, but havent gotten any explination from SSH on those. So anybody
got
> > any Ideas? And no I cant switch OS (sadly)...
> >
> > If this mail goes to the wrong list sorry, and could you please point me
in
> > the right direction?
> >
> > Regards
> > Patrik Carlsson
> >
> >
> > Patrik Carlsson
> > Ph.D Student
> > Dept. Telecommunications & Signalprocessing
> > Blekinge Institute of Technology
> > +46(0)455-385664
> > +46(0)733-800312
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Anne Carasik | An unsophisticated forecaster uses
> Principal Security Consultant | statistics as a drunken man uses
> SSH Communications Security, Inc. | lamp-posts - for support rather than
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | for illumination. -Andrew Lang
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unless stated otherwise above, the opinions expressed herein are my own,
> not of my employer.
>
